More mortgage help

Economists generally agree that to get the American economy moving again, the country has to solve it’s little housing problem. Today, President Obama will (or has, depending on when you read this) unveil  his mortgage recovery plan. This is seperate from the recently passed Stimulus Package, and taps into the original Bailout money. The reported cost is somewhere around $75 billion, but it will help approximately 9 million homeowners who are in danger of losing their home.

Here’s a bit of what’s in the plan: it will target homeowners who owe more than 80 percent on their mortgage, and try to get their monthly payments below 31% of their monthly income. It will offer incentives for servicers to modify their loans and help at-risk homeowners and create a $10 billion fund to protect those servicers from further declines in home values. The last two are perhaps the most important: It will allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages, and it will require all banks getting government money to participate in a standardized loan modification program.

What all this means, essentially, is that the government is trying to keep people in their houses. With fewer foreclosures, home prices will in theory, begin to rise again. That’s the idea, anyway. There are a lot of jobs attached to homebuilding–a lot of people to be put to work and the industry has essentially completely stalled.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. “No man is an island.” The thing I find interesting and oh-so mind boggling about the economy is just how complex and interconnected it is. It reminds me of Chaos Theory (A butterfly flaps its wings in China, and New York gets rain instead of sunshine…. Thank you Dr. Ian Malcolm). So, yes, on the one hand taxpayers are bailing out irresponsible homeowners (homeborrowers?). But there are also dangers in letting the market bottom out on its own and doing nothing (not to mention all the people that find themselves on the streets in the mean time) in that no one really knows what’ll happen or how bad it could get. There are legitimate points on both sides of the argument, and I think both sides tend to oversimplify it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s